Product Design. Kevin Otto, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Kristin Wood, University of Texas at Austin. ©2001|Pearson| Available. Share this page. This work is protected by local and international copyright laws and is provided solely for the use of instructors in teaching their courses and assessing student learning. Dissemination or sale of any part of this work (including on the World Wide Web) will destroy the integrity of the work and is not permitted. The work and materials from this site should never be made available to students except by instructors using the accompanying text in their classes. All recipients of this work are expected to abide by these restrictions and to honor the intended pedagogical purposes and the needs of other instructors who rely on these materials. Features • Fundamental approach—A systematic and methods-based strategy to product development. • Reverse engineering and product teardowns (dissection) offer a better paradigm for design instruction, permitting a modern learning cycle of experience, hypothesis, understanding, and new design execution. Ex.___ • Students see good design before they attempt design. • Systematic methods provide structure for the learning of design. Ex.___ • Concrete experiences with hands-on products. • Students gain confidence through improving commercial products. Ex.___ • Application of modern technologies. • Rapid numerical exploration links engineering analysis to design.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
September 2018
Categories |